[Linux-stm32] [PATCH v2] checkpatch: use utf-8 match for spell checking
Clement LE GOFFIC
clement.legoffic at foss.st.com
Tue May 20 13:14:02 UTC 2025
On 5/6/24 14:07, Clement LE GOFFIC wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A gentle reminder to review this patch.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Clément
>
> On 1/2/24 17:10, Antonio Borneo wrote:
>> The current code that checks for misspelling verifies, in a more
>> complex regex, if $rawline matches [^\w]($misspellings)[^\w]
>>
>> Being $rawline a byte-string, a utf-8 character in $rawline can
>> match the non-word-char [^\w].
>> E.g.:
>> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --git 81c2f059ab9
>> WARNING: 'ment' may be misspelled - perhaps 'meant'?
>> #36: FILE: MAINTAINERS:14360:
>> +M: Clément Léger <clement.leger at bootlin.com>
>> ^^^^
>>
>> Use a utf-8 version of $rawline for spell checking.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo at foss.st.com>
>> Reported-by: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic at foss.st.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - use $rawline_utf8 also in the while-loop's body;
>> - fix path of checkpatch in the commit message.
>> ---
>> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> index 25fdb7fda112..2d122d232c6d 100755
>> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> @@ -3477,9 +3477,10 @@ sub process {
>> # Check for various typo / spelling mistakes
>> if (defined($misspellings) &&
>> ($in_commit_log || $line =~ /^(?:\+|Subject:)/i)) {
>> - while ($rawline =~ /(?:^|[^\w\-'`])($misspellings)(?:
>> [^\w\-'`]|$)/gi) {
>> + my $rawline_utf8 = decode("utf8", $rawline);
>> + while ($rawline_utf8 =~ /(?:^|[^\w\-'`])($misspellings)
>> (?:[^\w\-'`]|$)/gi) {
>> my $typo = $1;
>> - my $blank = copy_spacing($rawline);
>> + my $blank = copy_spacing($rawline_utf8);
>> my $ptr = substr($blank, 0, $-[1]) . "^" x
>> length($typo);
>> my $hereptr = "$hereline$ptr\n";
>> my $typo_fix = $spelling_fix{lc($typo)};
>>
>> base-commit: b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86
Hi,
Is it just due to -ENOTIME for the maintainers, or are there doubts
about this patch? (inspired from a response of Uwe).
Clément
More information about the Linux-stm32
mailing list