[Linux-stm32] 回复: [PATCH v6 01/24] genirq/devres: Add devm_request_threaded_irq_probe() and devm_request_irq_probe()

panchuang panchuang at vivo.com
Wed Jul 9 09:13:21 UTC 2025


Hi tglx and Miquèl, Just a gentle ping on this patchset. I understand 
you're likely busy with many other tasks, but any feedback or guidance 
on how to proceed would be greatly appreciated. As discussed in the 
previous thread, there was some uncertainty about whether we should 
directly integrate dev_err_probe() into devm_request_threaded_irq(), or 
if it's better to create a wrapper function. Thanks for your time! 
Thanks, Panchuang

> Hi tglx and Miquèl,
>
> On Tue, Jun 24 2025 at 16:13, tglx wrote:
>> As you cited correctly I said back then:
>>
>>    "So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>>    function should print a well formatted and informative error
>>    message."
>>
>> This particular function is: devm_request_threaded_irq().
>>
>> IOW, I did not ask you should go an create a new one, right?
> Thank you all for your valuable feedback and guidance regarding the recent patch. I am a bit confused because, in the v1 version, no new function was added. However, in v2, tglx suggested introducing a new function[1]. Now, I would greatly appreciate your advice on the appropriate approach:
>
>    Should we directly integrate dev_err_probe() inside devm_request_threaded_irq()?
>    Or should we create a wrapper function instead?
>
> Thank you for your guidance.
>
> [1]https://lore.kernel.org/all/87h6qpyzkd.ffs@tglx/
>
> Thanks,
>
>          PanChuang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://st-md-mailman.stormreply.com/pipermail/linux-stm32/attachments/20250709/7b356e3b/attachment.html>


More information about the Linux-stm32 mailing list